Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, P. J. et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 184, 5635–5652 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Highly efficient prime editing by introducing same-sense mutations in pegRNA or stabilizing its structure. Nat. Commun. 13, 1669 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xu, W. et al. A design optimized prime editor with expanded scope and capability in plants. Nat Plants 8, 45–52 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. BE-PIGS: a base-editing tool with deaminases inlaid into Cas9 PI domain significantly expanded the editing scope. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 4, 36 (2019).
Google Scholar
Petri, K. et al. CRISPR prime editing with ribonucleoprotein complexes in zebrafish and primary human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 189–193 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR–Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1293–1298 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187–197 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. High-fidelity CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature 529, 490–495 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gu, J. et al. Substitution of Asp114 or Arg116 in the fingers domain of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase affects interactions with the template-primer resulting in decreased processivity. J. Mol. Biol. 305, 341–359 (2001).
Google Scholar
Das, D. et al. A directed approach to improving the solubility of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. Protein Sci. 10, 1936–1941 (2001).
Google Scholar
Katano, Y. et al. Generation of thermostable Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase variants using site saturation mutagenesis library and cell-free protein expression system. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 81, 2339–2345 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cote, M. L. et al. Murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase: structural comparison with HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Virus Res. 134, 186–202 (2008).
Google Scholar
Das, D. et al. The crystal structure of the monomeric reverse transcriptase from Moloney murine leukemia virus. Structure 12, 819–829 (2004).
Google Scholar
Bock, D. et al. In vivo prime editing of a metabolic liver disease in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabl9238 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ann Ran, F. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186–191 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yu, S. F. et al. Human foamy virus replication: a pathway distinct from that of retroviruses and hepadnaviruses. Science 271, 1579–1582 (1996).
Google Scholar
Wohrl, B. M. Structural and functional aspects of foamy virus protease-reverse transcriptase. Viruses 11, 598 (2019).
Google Scholar
Berkhout, B. et al. Identification of an active reverse transcriptase enzyme encoded by a human endogenous HERV-K retrovirus. J. Virol. 73, 2365–2375 (1999).
Google Scholar
Lee, Y. N. et al. Reconstitution of an infectious human endogenous retrovirus. PLoS Pathog. 3, e10 (2007).
Google Scholar
Mills, D. A. et al. Splicing of a group II intron involved in the conjugative transfer of pRS01 in lactococci. J. Bacteriol. 178, 3531–3538 (1996).
Google Scholar
Mohr, S. et al. Thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptase fusion proteins and their use in cDNA synthesis and next-generation RNA sequencing. RNA 19, 958–970 (2013).
Google Scholar
Dai, L. et al. ORF-less and reverse-transcriptase-encoding group II introns in archaebacteria, with a pattern of homing into related group II intron ORFs. RNA 9, 14–19 (2003).
Google Scholar
Blocker, F. J. et al. Domain structure and three-dimensional model of a group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase. RNA 11, 14–28 (2005).
Google Scholar
Stamos, J. L. et al. Structure of a thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptase with template-primer and its functional and evolutionary implications. Mol. Cell 68, 926–939 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhao, C. et al. Crystal structures of a group II intron maturase reveal a missing link in spliceosome evolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 558–565 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhao, C. et al. An ultraprocessive, accurate reverse transcriptase encoded by a metazoan group II intron. RNA 24, 183–195 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kelley, L. A. et al. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845–858 (2015).
Google Scholar
Liu, P. et al. Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2121 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, B. et al. A split prime editor with untethered reverse transcriptase and circular RNA template. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 779–786 (2022).
Google Scholar
Truong, D. J. et al. Development of an intein-mediated split–Cas9 system for gene therapy. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 6450–6458 (2015).
Google Scholar
Levy, J. M. et al. Cytosine and adenine base editing of the brain, liver, retina, heart and skeletal muscle of mice via adeno-associated viruses. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 97–110 (2020).
Google Scholar
Toro, N. et al. Multiple origins of reverse transcriptases linked to CRISPR–Cas systems. RNA Biol. 16, 1486–1493 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hopp, T. P. et al. A short polypeptide marker sequence useful for recombinant protein identification and purification. Bio/Technology 6, 1204–1210 (1988).
Google Scholar
Rohland, N. et al. Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture. Genome Res. 22, 939–946 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343–345 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481–485 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gramlich, M. et al. Antisense‐mediated exon skipping: a therapeutic strategy for titin‐based dilated cardiomyopathy. EMBO Mol. Med. 7, 562–576 (2015).
Google Scholar
Clement, K. et al. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 224–226 (2019).
Google Scholar
Grünewald, J. et al. Datasets. Sequence Read Archive (SRA). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/861237 (2022).
