[ad_1]
Bekker-Jensen, D. B. et al. An optimized shotgun strategy for the rapid generation of com- prehensive human proteomes. Cell Syst. 4, 587–599 (2017).
Google Scholar
Friedrich, C. et al. Comprehensive micro-scaled proteome and phosphoproteome characterization of archived retrospective cancer repositories. Nat. Commun. 12, 3576 (2021).
Xuan, Y. et al. Standardization and harmonization of distributed multi-center proteotype analysis supporting precision medicine studies. Nat. Commun. 11, 5248 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. TMTpro-18plex: the expanded and complete set of TMTpro reagents for sample multiplexing. J. Proteome Res. 20, 2964–2972 (2021).
Google Scholar
Messner, C. B. et al. Ultra-fast proteomics with Scanning SWATH. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 846–854 (2021).
Google Scholar
Petelski, A. A. et al. Multiplexed single-cell proteomics using SCoPE2. Nat. Protoc. 16, 5398–5425 (2021).
Google Scholar
Slavov, N. Driving single cell proteomics forward with innovation. J. Proteome Res. 20, 4915–4918 (2021).
Google Scholar
Slavov, N. Increasing proteomics throughput. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 809–810 (2021).
Google Scholar
Slavov, N. Unpicking the proteome in single cells. Science 367, 512–513 (2020).
Google Scholar
Singh, A. Towards resolving proteomes in single cells. en. Nat. Methods 18, 856 (2021).
Google Scholar
Slavov, N. Scaling up single-cell proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 21, 100179 (2022).
Boersema, P. J., Raijmakers, R., Lemeer, S., Mohammed, S. & Heck, A. J. Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 4, 484–494 (2009).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C. & Yates, J. R. III Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics. Chem. Rev. 113, 2343–2394 (2013).
Google Scholar
Petelski, A. A. & Slavov, N. Analyzing ribosome remodeling in health and disease. Proteomics 20, e2000039 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mertins, P. et al. iTRAQ labeling is superior to mTRAQ for quantitative global proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, M111.014423 (2012).
Google Scholar
O’Connell, J. D., Paulo, J. A., O’Brien, J. J. & Gygi, S. P. Proteome-wide evaluation of two common protein quantification methods. J. Proteome Res. 17, 1934–1942 (2018).
Google Scholar
Muntel, J. et al. Comparison of protein quantification in a complex background by DIA and TMT workflows with fixed instrument time. J. Proteome Res. 18, 1340–1351 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rauniyar, N. & Yates, J. R. III Isobaric labeling-based relative quantification in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 13, 5293–5309 (2014).
Google Scholar
Specht, H. & Slavov, N. Transformative opportunities for single-cell proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 17, 2563–2916 (2018).
Google Scholar
Specht, H. & Slavov, N. Optimizing accuracy and depth of protein quantification in experiments using isobaric carriers. J. Proteome Res. 20, 880–887 (2021).
Google Scholar
Venable, J. D., Dong, M.-Q., Wohlschlegel, J., Dillin, A. & Yates, J. R. Automated approach for quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra. Nat. Methods 1, 39–45 (2004) .
Google Scholar
Dong, M.-Q. et al. Quantitative mass spectrometry identifies insulin signaling targets in C. elegans. Science 317, 660–663 (2007).
Google Scholar
Navarro, P. et al. A multicenter study benchmarks software tools for label-free proteome quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1130–1136 (2016).
Google Scholar
Fernández-Costa, C. et al. Impact of the identification strategy on the reproducibility of DDA and DIA results. J. Proteome Res. 19, 3153–3161 (2020).
Google Scholar
Demichev, V., Messner, C. B., Vernardis, S. I., Lilley, K. S. & Ralser, M. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nat. Methods 17, 41–44 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sinitcyn, P. et al. MaxDIA enables library-based and library-free data-independent acquisition proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1563–1573 (2021).
Demichev, V. et al. High sensitivity dia-PASEF proteomics with DIA-NN and FragPipe. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.08.434385v1.full (2021).
Slavov, N. Single-cell protein analysis by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 60, 1–9 (2020).
Minogue, C. E. et al. Multiplexed quantification for data-independent acquisition. Anal. Chem. 87, 2570–2575 (2015).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Systematic proteome and proteostasis profiling in human Trisomy 21 fibroblast cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 1212 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pino, L. K., Baeza, J., Lauman, R., Schilling, B. & Garcia, B. A. Improved SILAC quantification with data-independent acquisition to investigate bortezomib-induced protein degradation. J. Proteome Res. 20, 1918–1927 (2021).
Zhong, X. et al. Mass defect-based DiLeu tagging for multiplexed data-independent acquisition. Anal. Chem. 92, 11119–11126 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tian, X., de Vries, M. P., Permentier, H. P. & Bischoff, R. A versatile isobaric tag enables proteome quantification in data-dependent and data-independent acquisition modes. Anal. Chem. 92, 16149–16157 (2020).
Tian, X., de Vries, M. P., Permentier, H. P. & Bischoff, R. The isotopic Ac-IP tag enables multiplexed proteome quantification in data-independent acquisition mode. Anal. Chem. 93, 8196–8202 (2021).
Salovska, B. et al. Isoform-resolved correlation analysis between mRNA abundance regulation and protein level degradation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9170 (2020).
Google Scholar
Haynes, S. E., Majmudar, J. D. & Martin, B. R. DIA-SIFT: a precursor and product ion filter for accurate stable isotope data-independent acquisition proteomics. Anal. Chem. 90, 8722–8726 (2018).
Google Scholar
Salovska, B., Li, W., Di, Y. & Liu, Y. BoxCarmax: a high-selectivity data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry method for the analysis of protein turnover and complex samples. Anal. Chem. 93, 3103–3111 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).
Google Scholar
Kang, U.-B., Yeom, J., Kim, H. & Lee, C. Quantitative analysis of mTRAQ-labeled proteome using full MS scans. J. Proteome Res. 9, 3750–3758 (2010).
Google Scholar
Cox, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2513–2526 (2014).
Google Scholar
Cooper, S. The synchronization manifesto: a critique of whole-culture synchronization. FEBS J. 286, 4650–4656 (2019).
Google Scholar
Aguilar, V. & Fajas, L. Cycling through metabolism. EMBO Mol. Med. 2, 338–348 (2010).
Google Scholar
Slavov, N. & Botstein, D. Coupling among growth rate response, metabolic cycle, and cell division cycle in yeast. Mol. Bio. Cell 22, 1997–2009 (2011).
Google Scholar
Leduc, A., Huffman, R. G. & Slavov, N. Droplet sample preparation for single-cell proteomics applied to the cell cycle. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.24.441211v1 (2021).
Fernandez-Lima, F., Kaplan, D. A., Suetering, J. & Park, M. A. Gas-phase separation using a trapped ion mobility spectrometer. Int. J. Ion Mobil. Spectrom. 14, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-011-0067-8 (2011).
Brunner, A.-D. et al. Ultra-high sensitivity mass spectrometry quantifies single-cell proteome changes upon perturbation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 18, e10798 (2022).
Cong, Y. et al. Ultrasensitive single-cell proteomics workflow identifies >1000 protein groups per mammalian cell. Chem. Sci. 12, 1001–1006 (2021).
Google Scholar
Slavov, N. Counting protein molecules for single-cell proteomics. Cell 185, 232–234 (2022).
Google Scholar
Denisov, E., Damoc, E. & Makarov, A. Exploring frontiers of orbitrap performance for long transients. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 466, 116607 (2021).
Google Scholar
Specht, H. et al. Single-cell proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of macrophage heterogeneity using SCoPE2. Genome Biol. 22, 50 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. TMTpro reagents: a set of isobaric labeling mass tags enables simultaneous proteome-wide measurements across 16 samples. Nat. Methods 17, 399–404 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huffman, R. G. et al. Prioritized single-cell proteomics reveals molecular and functional polarization across primary macrophages. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.16.484655v1 (2022).
Budnik, B., Levy, E., Harmange, G. & Slavov, N. SCoPE-MS: mass-spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. Genome Biol. 19, 161 (2018).
Google Scholar
Slavov, N. Learning from natural variation across the proteomes of single cells. PLOS Biol. 20, e3001512 (2022).
Franks, A., Airoldi, E. & Slavov, N. Post-transcriptional regulation across human tissues. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005535 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bamberger, C. et al. Protein footprinting via covalent protein painting reveals structural changes of the proteome in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Proteome Res. 20, 2762–2771 (2021).
Slavov, N. Measuring protein shapes in living cells. J. Proteome Res. 20, 3017–3017 (2021).
Google Scholar
Specht, H. et al. Automated sample preparation for high-throughput single-cell proteomics. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/399774v1 (2018).
Keshishian, H. et al. Quantitative, multiplexed workflow for deep analysis of human blood plasma and biomarker discovery by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 12, 1683–1701 (2021).
Google Scholar
Budnik, B., Levy, E., Harmange, G. & Slavov, N. Mass-spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/102681v1 (2017).
Huffman, G., Chen, A. T., Specht, H. & Slavov, N. DO-MS: data-driven optimization of mass spectrometry methods. J. Proteome Res. 18, 2493–2500 (2019).
Google Scholar
Huntley, R. et al. The GOA database: Gene Ontology annotation updates for 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1057–D1063 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hulstaert, N. et al. ThermoRawFileParser: modular, scalable, and cross-platform RAW file conversion. J. Proteome Res. 19, 537– 542 (2020).
Eiler, J. et al. Analysis of molecular isotopic structures at high precision and accuracy by Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 422, 126–142 (2017).
Makarov, A. & Denisov, E. Dynamics of ions of intact proteins in the Orbitrap mass analyzer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20, 1486– 1495 (2009).
